![]() ![]() ![]() To supposedly prove his point, Trump pointed to a Septemarticle in the Post written by Kovaleski in which the reporter mentioned police who “detained and questioned a number of people who were allegedly seen celebrating the attacks and holding tailgate-style parties.” At his South Carolina rally on November 24 of last year, Trump flew into a derisive impression of Kovaleski as he claimed that the reporter was backing away from an article he’d written for The Washington Post in 2001.Īt that point in his campaign, Trump was under fire for his claim that American muslims “celebrated” the destruction of the World Trade Center twin towers by terrorists on September 11, 2001. Kovaleski suffers from arthrogryposis, a congenital condition that restricts the movement of the muscles in his arms. The fact-check tagged Trump with four “Pinocchios” - its most damning rating - for his misstatements.Trump mocks reporter with disability Donald Trump is under fire again, this time for mocking a New York Times reporter that suffers from a chronic condition. The Washington Post went further, resurfacing a detailed fact-check it did when Trump first mocked Kovaleski and running it prominently on the home page. The Los Angeles Times was more forceful in challenging Trump’s claim. Other news outlets, including Politico and the major networks, also presented Streep’s and Trump’s as simply two versions of an event. The Times wasn’t the only news organization that fumbled this one. Trump’s reaction to Meryl Streep - and should have properly rebutted Mr. The story was written under deadline pressure after midnight and we focused squarely on the news event at hand - Mr. Trump mocking one of our colleagues - a reporter who was in Trump’s line of fire for contradicting Trump’s claims that “thousands and thousands” of people were “cheering” the fall of the World Trade Center after the Sept. Trump’s extensive denial, I should have made sure we included a clear reminder to readers of the video that plainly shows Mr. This was her candid and undefensive response: I asked Danielle Mattoon, editor of the Culture desk that produced the stories, about the decision to let Trump’s version stand without any further context or fact-checking. But they are also the slipperiest of slopes. These may seem like small issues, even down to single turns of phrase. In my mind it is not even so much an issue over printing Trump’s response, but that there was not an immediate refutation of his claims by the article’s author in the piece itself. It is dangerous to give Donald Trump, a known and habitual liar, the opportunities to attempt to paint lies as truth. Plenty of readers noticed The Times’s failure to rebut Trump. The Times’s own reporting shows this, as does that of other news outlets. What’s more, the rest of Trump’s contention - that he had never met Kovaleski, and that the reporter had been trying to walk back a story - are simply not true. As it turns out, the facts align more closely with Streep’s account, as most anyone who looks at the video would see. It let Streep give her version (that he was mocking a disabled reporter) and Trump give his (that he wasn’t). Nowhere in its news coverage Monday did The Times challenge the truthfulness of Trump’s account. ![]() And it wrote a separate story on Trump’s reaction to Streep’s remarks, in which Trump insisted in an interview with The Times once more that he was not mocking Kovaleski, but merely imitating a flustered reporter who was trying to back away from a story he had written. In its main story of Streep’s speech, it referred to Trump “appearing to mock” a disabled reporter at The Times. This time, however, The Times adopted more of a he-said-she-said approach when it described Trump’s remarks at the rally. Trump, campaigning in 2015 when he made fun of a disabled reporter. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |